Plan a DP Combination for a STEM Direction
Translate a broad STEM interest into verified course requirements, realistic subject choices and useful exploration.

Replace STEM with two concrete directions
STEM includes courses with substantially different entry requirements and daily work. Choose two or three plausible directions, such as mechanical engineering, biological science, or computing, and explain what attracts you to each. You do not need a final career decision. You need examples specific enough to research. Keep curiosity separate from demonstrated experience: enjoying a technology product does not yet show whether you enjoy mathematical modelling, laboratory investigation, or programming. Plan a small opportunity to try the relevant work.
Build a requirements table from institutions
Select a small sample of official undergraduate course pages for the intended entry year. Record required subjects and levels, mathematics course wording, and any recommended preparation in separate columns. Do not infer a requirement from the subjects shown in an example IB combination. If a mathematics policy or subject equivalence is unclear, ask admissions with your exact courses. The table should reveal shared constraints and meaningful differences. It should not turn one institution's rule into a claim about all engineering or science programmes.
Investigate the learning demanded by choices
Discuss your strongest evidence and preparation gaps with mathematics and science teachers. Examine representative course tasks rather than comparing reputations. A science choice may require sustained attention to evidence, uncertainty, and explanations as well as remembering content. Mathematics course decisions involve the actual syllabus and assessment for your cohort. Consider whether you are willing to practise difficult skills consistently. Choosing a subject because it appears on a requirements table makes sense only alongside a workable plan for learning it.
Use breadth to develop relevant habits
The DP's other subjects and core can support communication, ethical reasoning, and independent inquiry. Identify one useful connection without forcing every task into a STEM theme. A language assignment can improve precise explanation; a humanities discussion can question how evidence is interpreted; TOK can examine a model's limits. Choose an EE question for feasibility and disciplinary methods, rather than assuming a complicated scientific title will impress admissions. Keep school resources and supervision central when considering any practical investigation.
Worked example: biology or engineering
An illustrative student is considering biotechnology and engineering and enjoys chemistry and mathematical problem solving. Their course table shows that the sampled institutions do not all use the same science requirements. They investigate which direction needs physics, clarify mathematics wording, and compare the school's possible combinations. A small data-analysis task and a supervised practical discussion help test their interests. The student then chooses a combination that protects verified priorities and fits their preparation, accepting that preserving every route may be impossible.
Define exploration and a review point
Write the chosen subjects and levels, the routes researched, and the remaining uncertainty. Add one manageable exploration task: analyse an open dataset, read an accessible university course description, or discuss a technical problem with a teacher. Set a review before your school's subject-change deadline, and revisit admissions information when your application year approaches. A STEM plan should become more precise as you learn. It should connect current study to realistic next steps without promising admission or treating breadth as wasted time.
Your next-step checklist
Checklist choices stay in this browser.
Official references
This is an original practical guide from IBvia. The examples are illustrative; your subject guide, assessment year and school instructions determine the requirements.

